0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1920 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 240 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:14:19 EDT 2025 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6LBnXIumaw/E---3.1_17698.p 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # new_ho_10_unif with pid 17791 completed with status 0 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10_unif 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 130s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # ehoh_best_nonlift with pid 17795 completed with status 0 0.20/0.50 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 130s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # Proof found! 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_23, type, cN: $i > $i). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, cM: $i > $i). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, epred1_0: ($i > $i) > $o). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.20/0.50 thf(cEXT_A_LEIB2, conjecture, (![X1:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X1 @ cN)<=>(X1 @ cM)))<=![X2:$i, X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ (cM @ X2))<=>(X3 @ (cN @ X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6LBnXIumaw/E---3.1_17698.p', cEXT_A_LEIB2)). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X2:$i, X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ (cM @ X2))<=>(X3 @ (cN @ X2))))=>![X1:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X1 @ cN)<=>(X1 @ cM))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEXT_A_LEIB2])])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X8:$i > $o]:((((~(X8 @ (cM @ X7))|(X8 @ (cN @ X7)))&(~(X8 @ (cN @ X7))|(X8 @ (cM @ X7))))&((~(epred1_0 @ cN)|~(epred1_0 @ cM))&((epred1_0 @ cN)|(epred1_0 @ cM))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ cN)|(epred1_0 @ cM)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0 @ cN))|~((epred1_0 @ cM))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((epred1_0 @ cM)|((cN)!=(cM))), inference(ext_eqfact,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_6, plain, ((cN)!=(cM)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_5])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ (cN @ X2))|~((X3 @ (cM @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_8, plain, ((cN @ esk2_0)!=(cM @ esk2_0)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((cN @ X2)=(cM @ X2))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_7])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_10, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 3 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 6 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 15 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 2 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 1 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 12 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 3 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 13 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 2 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 3 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 4 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 2 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 3 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 8 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 531 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 125 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages 0.20/0.50 % E exiting 0.20/0.50 % E exiting 0.20/0.50 EOF